Summaries of some recent mainstream science articles on Climate Progress provide a reality dose against the DEP's champaigne toast. For instance:
- The consequences of 5.5°C warming by 2100, which Hadley says is “likely” on our current emissions path are all but unimaginable — mass extinction, devastating ocean acidification, brutal summer-long heat waves, rapidly rising sea levels, widespread desertification. But they are rarely studied or articulated by scientists who can’t imagine humanity would be so stupid as to let this happen. I have tried to piece them together them together from the scientific literature (see “Is 450 ppm (or less) politically possible? Part 0: The alternative is humanity’s self-destruction“).













1 comments
Excellent post.
Thanks again for writing about Retire Garrett as well as the new PAC. Things are heating up as people become more aware of Garrrett's atrocious voting record on issues like the environment. Likewise people are becoming more aware of the politicians who allow our environment to crumble so they can tell their consitutents they are keeping taxes low and supporting issues that "really" matter.
Post a Comment